the operational art of war iv air combat

National security, a topic routinely discussed behind closed doors by Washington's political scientists and policy makers, is believed to be an insider's game. We end by suggesting a way he could defend a weaker version of his view. We argue that although the project's motivation is noble and some of his findings are insightful, his key explanations, inferences, and prescriptions are wanting. After summarizing his arguments, we isolate and discuss the three most important and contentious issues in his book. He claims that these differences are best understood by consulting an array of psychological studies, key genetic findings, and the theoretical underpinnings of sociobiology.

Conservatives and Liberals have distinct (although somewhat overlapping) moral views and they understand human nature differently. Once we understand that the differences between disputants spring from distinct moral views held by equally sincere people, then we will no longer have reason for deep political animus. His aim is not just explanatory but also prescriptive.

Jonathan Haidt's The Righteous Mind seeks to explain why it is difficult for liberals and conservatives to get along.

The operational art of war iv air combat